自相残杀

He is an activist - one who tries to steer the public towards some ideology, be it democracy or free speech. It is his job to advocate his visionary ideas even when most people do not initially support or even understand his vision. His job is to win them over to his vision, not to go along with the crowd. Such is the situation with Ghandhi of India and so on.

She is a politician - one who tries to represent the people's wishes. It is her job to speak in accordance to what the people want, nevermind moral or immoral. Thus if the majority of the people are against homosexuality or if they perceive requesting foreign support as "foreign interference in domestic politics", it is her job to agree with the people! Her job is to win votes, so as to represent the people's view in parliament, not to steer the population towards her own view and risk losing votes in the process!

Each is important in his/her own way, just as India needed both Ghandi and its PM.

Such simple things, the people in SDP and WP do not understand.

They look upon each other as enemies.

有你没有我。

They have fallen for our trap!!!

We, in young Pay-And-Pay, have succeeded in driving a wedge between the oppositions!

We did this by masquerading as WP supporters to bash SDP, and then as SDP supporters to bash WP.

We egged their genuine supporters on, and get them to bash each other!

We start the spark and join the fight, bashing both sides like double-headed snakes, without them even knowing that we are moving from side to side!

We did it!

Boss, it's time to give us a raise!

鹬蚌相争，渔翁得利！

We, young Pay-and-Pay, are very good fishermen. LOL

Dr. Chee commits treason against PAP

(pic grabbed from Lucky Tan's blog)

Just when I thought Dr. Chee's thinking was weird enough, his thought became weirder!

This time, his weird thinking got him to think that he is being a patriotic Singaporean when he speaks up against PAP.

This is his logic step by step:

1. He criticised PAP at the International Bar Association meeting in front of so many foreigners!

2. This would lead to the international community to help Singaporeans to exert pressure on PAP to open up on areas of free speech, free press, freedom to assembly etc.

3. With all these "free"s, Singaporean (not foreigners) will be able to vote in the elections with more information than what they could get from a 146th ranked newspaper

4. Such a better election system is ultimately better for Singapore.

5. Thus, his action is one of patriotism, and he is a patriotic Singaporean


Wrong!

Let me refute his weird logic in 2 simple super-logical steps:

1. PAP = Singapore. Singapore = PAP. Political Part = Country. Country = Political Party.

2. It follows from 1 that: criticise PAP = criticise Singapore = traitor = treason!

QED.


Now, contrast my logic with his. Whose logic do you think is more logical?

Mine of course!

“Of course" because people in North Korea and Mao's China subscribed to my logic too.

I have mass support (1 billion people in China during Mao's time leh) and this means I am right... though of course, there was a time when 99.99% of people thought the earth was flat and they were wrong. But that's a little fact that most people do not know. So it's ok to use the "most people think so = I am right" argument on these fools. It's one of my favourite trick argument, in fact. We in Young Pay-And-Pay use it all the time.

And wise men think alike. Andre Yeo (though not a man), thinks like me too! The above picture was what she wrote for The New Paper.


Sooooooooooooo simple! And yet Dr. Chee doesn't know! How did he get his Ph.D.?

He should learn from Andre Yeo and I. Ass Lickers and Apple polishers like us makes lots of money.

Look at Dr. Chee - he is a bankrupt!

Now isn't it better to be Andre Yeo and I -- throw all morals to the wind and suck cocks and make lots of money, and be labeled patriots...

...than to become a bankrupt and be accused of being a traitor?

Some people will say: "wait a minute. What about retribution aka Karma? Hell? Heaven?"

As I said earlier, that's rubbish! At the end of the day, we answer only to our money. There is no hell, no heaven, no karma. Our action has absolutely no consequence.

Take Karma, for example. Today I just bumped my head into the wall. I didn't even feel any pain! Got action, but no reaction. Since physical world is already like that, then it follows, on a matter of probability, that most likely the non-physical world (e.g. your evil thoughts) is also like that: got action, no reaction one lah!

Erm, the previous paragraph sounded somewhat illogical. But never mind, so long as I am not speaking against PAP, I am a patriot and patriots, no matter how illogical, will not get tekan by Andre Yeo in New Paper. Haha! So I do not need to be too careful with my words. Nobody will be suing me. Dr. Chee, on the other hand, need be very careful with his logics.

In conclusion, Dr. Chee, please stop committing treason against Singapore by criticising PAP. Please praise PAP. That will make you a patriot of PAP and therefore a patriot of Singapore!

Singapore = PAP. We must drill this into Dr. Chee's head! 66.6% of Singaporeans have already accepted that. Why can't he?

Dr. Chee's weird thinking

I really don't understand this Dr. Chee Soon Juan.

Why does he want to do this?

What's wrong with our government doing business with Myanmar, or supplying arms to the Generals there to kill their citizens, as he alleged?

Let this Young Pay-And-Pay member tell you why there is nothing wrong!

One simple word: MONEY!

In Singapore, only one thing matters: money!

For example, if you can make money for Singapore, we will behave like whores and open our pussy for you to f**k as you please.

Thus, a German girl could have her drug charges reduced because her parents were making money for Singapore.

Thus, a Finnish man could punch a Singaporean and get off lightly in court, and subsequently be invited to lick our bosses balls in our esteemed newspaper.

Thus, a British woman could knock down and kill a korean mother and her 3 children, and pay just a fine and no jail time. That's a few years ago.

Thus, a drunk Japanese man could drink-drive and kill Mr. Hua Liang - renowed Singaporean in the Chinese cultural scene - and, yes, you guess it right, get off scot free!! That's even more years ago.

Truth is, we have been independent for 40+ years. And in that many years, we have never even once wavered from our sole focus on MONEY and MONEY only, to the exclusion of everything else!

Justice? Morals? Ethics? What are all these shit? We have no time for such things. We only have time for one thing. You got it right: MONEY!

Now, on the other hand, if you cannot make money for Singapore, we propose to ship you to Bintan. And that, my friend, is simply the latest of our long series of MONEY-only policy since our independence.

AND THE VOTERS LOVE SUCH MONEY-ONLY POLICY!

Yes, even when it affected them directly. So, what's more when it does not affect them directly?

So. let the Government continue to supply arms to Myanmar to kill those monks. There are lots of money to be made in those arm deals, you know?

I have no problem with that.

I do not believe in Karma.

That the Taliban Afghanistan government collapsed and kana attacked, almost immediately after they had defaced some religious relics, is simply a coincidence.

Holy people and objects can be defamed, murdered or destroyed. No consequence at all.

So yes, continue to do business with the Myanmar Generals, I would say. Allow them to torture citizens, kill holy monks (or priests, or Imans, or whatever. WHO CARES?)

No retribution will ever befall Singapore for being an accessory to murder.

That's because, to repeat, there is no such thing as karma, or retribution. And, for that matter, neither are there such things as morals or ethics too! How much money are morals and ethics worth? Kachang Puteh?

Money! More Money! Even more Money! That's what we in Young Pay-And-Pay stands for.

Oh, by the way, if you don't like what I say, you can always offer me $1,000,000. I can always change my tune and start praising Dr. Chee, and proceed to write a 5000 word essay on why we should distance ourselves from Myanmar.

My morality is fluid. Very fluid. How much can you pay me? That's the question, you need to ask. Nothing else matters.

Dr. Chee, on the other hand, sigh!

He obviously believes strongly that apart from money, there are such things as human decency and morality and "doing the right thing". And that all these matter more than blood money.

Wah Piang! He is so out of touch with Singapore and what Singaporeans want!

Singapore does not need people like him.

Singapore needs only money faced people like us in Young Pay-And-Pay!



P.S. If you find my logic beyond comprehension, I do apologise. I too, find this blog completely devoid of logic. Sometimes, even I laugh when I read the illogical things that I have written. But, you must understand that I laugh even more when I look at my bank account. Well, it does pay to be an obedient Ass Licker and a diligent Apple Polisher. At the end of the day, M O N E Y is really the only thing that matters. No Karma, remember? LOL

难兄难弟

Tay Za (left, close associate of General Than Shwe), with Lim Kim Choon, director general and chief executive officer of CAAS. Taken on 7 Sep 07

"We need to keep Myanmar in the family and handle the problems there with a certain degree of understanding and compassion. Of course people who live further away can have their own views, but I believe we have a deeper understanding of the situation there, and the stand we take is the correct stand," said [Foreign Affairs Minister] Mr Yeo.

Of course! Of course!

Today, they shoot their dissidents, we show them "understanding and compassion".

Tomorrow, when it is our turn to shoot our dissidents, they will repay our "understanding and compassion" too.

You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours.

We and they - comrades in arms, 难兄难弟！

I dare you!

These handsome men are my counterparts in Myanmar.

Though we are of different breed, we are all dogs - running dogs aka 走狗！

And as all good running dogs all over the world do, in peace time, we bark, and in riotous time, we bite!

One unique feature which separates us, running dogs, from you people is this: while you people have internal morality and principles , we have nothing of that sort.

我们的良心被狗吃了 被钱财与权利给淹没了。

We recognise only 2 things: One, money. Two, power. Give us some money and some power, and we will pledge our unquestionable loyalty to the giver. That is, for as long as the money and power continue our way. (The questioning part will come, when we are no longer given money or power).

For a price, we will throw morality to the wind, and do anything and everything our Masters order us to do.

Yes, that includes killing you peasants if you people dare rebel.

革命是需要流血的。

你们有种吗？

没有吧！

那就乖乖继续做奴才，替我们打工到死吧！

Stop looking to Myanmar for inspiration!!!

Those people have balls. You slaves don't!

Now, go back to work and work and work...till you drop dead.

I can tell you straightaway right now, right in your face:

No welfare means no welfare.

You can be old and sick and had contributed to the economy for the past 60 years. SO WHAT? WE DON'T FUCKING CARE!!!!

Stop bothering us with your plight, you > 85 years old 的老不死！

What has that to do with us? We are young - being from Young Pay-And-Pay! 85 years old is too far for us to imagine.

If you really want welfare, foot the bill with even more of your own money, after having paid us lots of money!

Not happy ah?

Dare to meet us in the cul-de-sac? We have our knuckle duster on. We are ready for YOU.

I dare you to rebel!

Woof! Woof!

Nonsensical quotes 3

“You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything, he's no longer in your power - he's free again.”, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, Russian novelist, dramatist and historian.

Huh? Sure or not?

I know of 4 million slaves, who have been robbed of everything. Yet they are still under our power!

Oh well, on 2nd thought, maybe we, in the Young Pay-And-Pay, define "everything" differently from these slaves.

Maybe to us, $600,000 is a peanut, and so $3,000,000 is nothing more than 5 peanuts, whereas to these slaves, to have food and lodging is already "something". And so since they all have "something", they are still under our power!

Slaves are really easy to control! LOL

More good years of power (and money) for us!

Nonsensical quotes 2

“It is a paradox that every dictator has climbed to power on the ladder of free speech. Immediately on attaining power each dictator has suppressed all free speech except his own.”, Herbert Hoover, American President, 1874 - 1964

Talk cock again!

I happen to know one old man, who managed to defy this trend. He used to be the lawyer for workers and trade unions and fought for the rights of these commoners to speak up and to protest. He even made long speeches in the legislative assembly where he strongly advocated free speech and urged for democracy.

Later on, he "climbed to power on the ladder of free speech", yet he still dishes out free speech to all his citizens， none of whom need be fearful of speaking up. He had used defamation suit, but only when he was really defamed. He had shut down newspapers, but only when they really deserved to be shut down.

Thankfully, there are people like him around, to prove President Hoover wrong.

Nonsensical quotes 1

“It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things than power.”, David Brin, American science-fiction writer.

Nonsense!

My Apples and Asses have lots of power. But they are not corruptible. Neither are they insane.

But still, prevention is better than cure - better legalise corruption and pay them a few millions legally than to have then end up with one million illegally.

原来如此！

PM Lee said: "It's a very divisive issue, our view or my view is that gayness is mostly something in-born; some people are like that and some people are not...

Funny! How would he know? How would his father know too?

I used to wonder.

But not anymore...

since I stumbled upon these photos online:

This is how he always sits

in contrast to these two male politicians...

but similar - in fact symmetrical -
to this female politician...

This is how he shakes hand...

and this is how his
super feminine wife looks like...

Aha, now I see!

Suddenly, it's all clear!

No wonder he knows what many of his biased colleagues do not know. LOL!

Oral sex

Singapore has repealed the law on oral sex among heterosexuals.

Do you know why?

Answer: That's so that Young Pay-And-Pay members like me can suck our bosses' cocks without fear!

Dear PM Lee,
Thank you for repealing this outdated law, so that we all now can suck your cock without violating the law. On behalf of Young Pay-And-Pay, I would like to commend you on your outstanding leadership and excellent performance and...

Your cock-sucking dog,
Young Pay-And-Pay

Citizen on Surveillance

Sep 16, 2007
The Straits Times
THE next time engineer Kelvin Kai goes for his evening walk or to have a drink at the coffee shop, he will also be on the lookout for suspicious-looking people in his neighbourhood.

Mr Kai, 48, is among 43 residents in the Braddell Heights area who have volunteered to take part in a neighbourhood watch programme called Citizens On Surveillance.

Under the project, resident volunteers such as Mr Kai will be trained in crime detection skills, such as how to detect suspicious persons and note down their physical characteristics.

The volunteers are also taught how to look inconspicuous while on their rounds. They are to pass any information they have gathered to the police.

I spy on you, you spy on me.
All while trying to look inconspicuous.

I report on you, you report on me
One whole nation of citizens surveillancing each other.

I am being watched everywhere I go, and I watch you everywhere you go.

It's like Nazi Germany, cultural revolution China, current North Korea.

I love such countries. Our little red dot is soooooo exciting!

For this reason alone, I will never emigrate. Quite the opposite.

I, a very "on" member of Young Pay-And-Pay, has already signed up for this program.

Fellow citizens, watch out!

I will be "on the lookout" for you while you walk, eat, shop and follow you around anywhere and everywhere. But don't worry. You won't realise you are being watched. I will be inconspicuous． The police have trained me well.

And when the police eventually stopped you, you wouldn't even know why they picked you out, out of so many people. I am inconspicuous, remember? LOL

Long Live PAP.
May you live as long as Nazi Germany, China under the cultural revolution, and North Korea did.

我悄悄监视你，你偷偷举报我。
我与你划清界限。你给我来个大义灭亲。
新加坡式文化大革命由我YPAP愤青开始！

人人做间谍，百姓狗咬狗。
监视有理，举报无罪！
监视有理，举报无罪！
Majullah PAP!

LPPL

Every country, no matter how successful, has its share of beggars and vagrants.

What's the profile of these people?

Well, in other countries, these are almost exclusively middle-aged good-for-nothing - the drunkards, the alcoholics, the drug-abusers - and of course, the mentally unstable, and so on.

NOT ELDERLIES who deserve their golden years, having contributed to society for 40+ years!

But in unique Singapore, our beggars and vagrants are predominatly senior citizens! (Pics from sammyboy kopitiam).








Now, that's a very glaring difference between Singapore's vagrants and those of other developed countries.

The implication?

Answer: We, members of young Pay-And-Pay, would need to work harder to find better excuses to appease intelligent citizens, than to come up with cock and bull nonsense about "in every society... there will be bums, trash collectors, vagrants..."

Some people are just lousy running dogs! Useless! Coming up with nonsensical "reasons" that cannot withhold scrutiny, and sure to look bad.

Such bums should be kicked out of Young Pay-And-Pay. They are really 成事不足，败事有余！ Suck cock, don't know how to suck cock; Only know how to LPPL and backfire every time and make us in Young Pay-And-Pay looks bad in the public's eyes.

They should learn from me. I always come up with fool-proof excuses for my bosses. In this case, the perfect excuses are:

- old people in other countries are lazy couch potatoes.
- old people in other countries are good for nothing aka parasites.

or resort to some personal attacks:

- Why must we imitate ang moh society? Excuse me, we are Asians. What is the colour of your skin?

Such personal attacks will throw our opponents off balance and divert the whole issue away. Always a good tatics when we have nothing better to say.

Haha!

睡懒觉

What is there to listen?

The bottom line is clear:

• All money collected by the government is for the reserves/ GIC/ Temasek/ ministers' salaries.
• Therefore, no money is available for senior citizens who refuse to die.
• Therefore, to look after senior citizens, you peasants must cough up extra money, one way or the other.

Such a simple reasoning, even I, merely a member of young Pay-And-Pay, can understand in 1 minute.

No wonder our very talented ministers find it too boring to listen.

Better to catch some rest aka 睡懒觉！

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

拍马屁

是谁放了几小时的屁？
这么臭！！

Can the one who has been farting non-stop for the last one hour, please stop farting immediately?

For goodness sake, our poor leader had to clamp his nose shut to keep the smell out!

But of course, others would gladly clap their hands in enthusiasm.

That's literally 拍马屁！

Hahaha!

A fair system

“我最感激的是新加坡有一个公平的制度，无论是本地人还是外国人，大家都有机会在同一个起跑点上竞争。” - 两年前和父母同获新加坡公民权的总统奖学金得主刘晨之父亲刘洛生

“What I am most gratified is that Singapore has a fair system, such that no matter citizens or foreigners, everyone has equal opportunity to compete at the same starting point" - Father of Liu Cheng, president scholar and new citizen of 2 years.

I am very pleased to know that our Chinese newspaper has devoted a special interview piece to highlight the above message to their readers - potential new citizens from China.

I am most happy that our system does not confer any "unfair" advantage whatsoever to Singaporeans vis a vis foreigners

I am full of joy to know that citizenship comes with National Service liability but does not confer any special starting point or opportunity to Singaporeans.

All these means that citizenship is worthless and nothing pleases me more than that.

Now, all these may sounds contradictory, but if you think carefully, it is actually all very logical and makes perfect sense because.....



P.S. The above are the gist of this unfinished post. I will wriggle my way out and cook up some distorted reasoning to justify my joy and happiness later.

Sigh, being a member of Young Pay-And-Pay is not easy. Sometimes, logic and reasoning must be twisted so much and plucked out of thin air, such that it really cause me migraine!

So, don't envy us Young Pay-And-Pay members, ok! Our money and power do come as easily as you peasants imagine. Boot-licking and Apple-polishing are refined arts that require years of hard training!

And even then, right now, I am having a writer's block!

But no matter, because regardless of what silly nonsensical reasoning I cook up eventually, it will be published faithfully by the newspapers, for you peasants to regurgitate, and any contrary view will get no airing!

Ok, time to get my creative juice cranking.

Any suggestions?

National Service

This is Stephanie Ko, one of this year's president scholar.

Taxpayers will be footing $500,000 (half a million), so that she can study medicine at Cambridge University for free.

That's because, in a departure from past practice where medical students who had chosen to study overseas received the honour of being president scholars but no tuition payment, PSC now pays half a million to each of them for their free overseas medical education.

This is how Straits Times' Ho Ai Li reported her background:

...her father, Mr Ko Kheng Hwa, 52, who also received the scholarship in 1974. He is now managing director of the Economic Development Board.

I am absolutely aghast!

How can this nutty reporter highlight Mr. Ko's exact job title at EDB?

In doing so, this reporter has done a great disservice to both our elites and peasants:

• She has indirectly highlighted that Mr. Ko can well afford to pay for his daughter's UK education, thus making both father and daughter look greedy in accepting this half-million-dollars scholarship! We should not be make our elites look bad in the eyes of the peasants!
• she has reinforced the impression that apart from a few exceptions, scholarships are usually given to the sons and daughters of our elites. This will make our peasants unhappy!
  
• she has denied our peasants' the hope that their families can rise up the social ladder when their sons or daughters become president scholars. Such false hope is needed to garner peasants' support!

She deserved to be given 3 strokes of the rotan!

She should learn from her counterpart from the Chinese newspaper. This is how 沈越 reported:

许倩雯还有一名哥哥，她的父亲是经济发展局职员，而母亲则是家庭主妇。

By calling Mr. Ko an employee ("职员"), rather than a Managing Director ("执行主席"), this reporter has done an excellent job.

Now, that's National Service at its best!

Please stop crying

"Jobs for Foreigners, NS for Singaporeans"??

Please lah, that's so out of fashion!

Meet the new slogan:

Schools for Foreigners.
Leftovers for Singaporeans!

The New Paper
Day of Tension, Agony & Ectasy
By Veena Bharwani
August 15, 2007

AT 5am, he was the first to register his child for the final phase of primary one registration that late July morning.

But yesterday afternoon, halfway through the balloting process at Canberra Primary, as he listened to the names being called out, Mr Thangavel Pandi thought being the first was his biggest mistake.

Said Mr Thangavel, 34, an Indian national and permanent resident here: 'I went very early in the morning for the registration, thinking it would give my son better odds.

'I was the first in line and only after 15 minutes did more parents show up to register.

'But today, as I looked at them fishing names out of the ballot bowl, I thought since he was the first to be registered, his name would be right at the bottom. I started to lose confidence.'

He started to pray that whoever it was that was fishing the names out of the bowl would thoroughly shuffle the cards that held the names of more than 200 students.

He needn't have worried. Mr Thangavel's son's was the 78th name to be called out.

As expected, Mr Thangavel, his wife T Karpa Valli, 29, and their son Sushin Thangavel, 6, leapt with joy.

'I'm so happy. I had done research on all the schools nearby. I went to all their websites and I really liked this school,' said Mr Thangavel, a manager at Toshiba.

Registering early does not give any child an edge over another. All names written on cards are put into a bowl and mixed thoroughly throughout the process to ensure fairness.

At Canberra Primary, there were 96 places available for 255 applicants.

Principal Ratnasingam Selvarani, 59, said some parents started queueing for the waiting list even before the balloting ended.

'We open the wait list after the balloting process ends. But by the middle of the process, more than 50 parents were already in queue to be waitlisted for the school,' she said.

TEAM WORK

She added: 'The parents come in pairs. One is upstairs listening to the names being called, and the other standing in the waitlist queue. Then they communicate with each other on the handphone.

'So the queue gets a bit shorter at the end as those successful in the balloting process drop out of the queue.'

Those on the waiting list may get a place later in the year or next year when vacancies open up.

Yesterday, balloting was held at 73 schools during the final phase - phase 2C - of the registration. This is for children with no ties to the school, or who have been unsuccessful in earlier stages.

Mr Thangavel was not the only one who waited in agony.

Mr Dennis Olivera, 33, an engineer, appeared tense throughout the process, but flashed a bright smile when he heard his daughter's name, Denise Samantha Olivera, called out - right at the end, the 92nd name.


DISAPPOINTMENT

Not everyone was as lucky.

Madam Boo Sock Li, who was vying for places for her twin boys Kwa Yu Heng and Kwa Yu Lian, both 6, went home disappointed as both didn't get a place.

The boys were given one ballot card, so if one boy's name was called out, the other would get a place too.

Said Madam Boo: 'I'm disappointed as this school was my first choice. It's right across from my block. Now we'll have to look for another school.'

Over at West Grove Primary in Jurong, a parent who declined to give her name cried profusely after her son didn't get in the school.

'I just got divorced and I'm supporting myself. Now, I have to take another day off to register my son at another school,' she said.

The school was popular - 316 applicants living within a 1km radius of the school have registered for 125 places.

Some parents, however, appeared less caught up in the balloting frenzy.

At Maris Stella Primary School, balloting was conducted among 29 candidates for only two places.

Teo Hong Rui and Wesley Chang Wai Woka, both 6, won the ballot.

But when their names were announced, there was no reaction from the crowd of parents gathered.

Why? Both the boys and their parents weren't present during the balloting.

Can some kind reader please explain to me why Madam Boo Sock Li was disappointed?

Disappointed with what?

Isn't it our honour to give up our children's slots in our schools to new permanent residents?

Heck, that's what we 66.6% voted for: to replace ourselves with foreigners for the sake of Singapore!

How can Madam Boo be so forgetful as to what she or 66.6% of her neighbours voted to do?

Madam Boo should instead have walked up to Mr. Thangavel and said:

"Dear Sir,
Today, both my Singapore-born Singapore-citizen sons serve your family well by giving up their school places to your India-born India-citizen son. BUT THAT'S NOT ENOUGH! 12 years later, I will make sure my two sons serve your family again, by doing NS to protect you and your wife's safety, while your son is away from Singapore, having given up his PR to avoid NS! BUT THAT'S NOT ENOUGH! So, another 12 years after that, when you son comes back to Singapore as a "new" PR, in need of a job but too old to do NS, my children will give up their jobs so that your son can have one. Having no jobs, my two sons will then kill time, by doing more reservists and IPPT to ensure the safety and pleasure of your family! The honour is ours, Sir!"

Like that, then got style mah!

Geez, one parent even cried.

Why? Crazy is it?

To serve foreigners who have become PR, is an honour!

These crying and disappointed parents should simply treat this school slots issue as a "practice run". A kind of initiation for their sons for things to come later in life:

Today it's a place in a school. Tomorrow, it is a job in the real world.

Better start early and learn from young!

I think we, members of Young Pay-And-Pay, have a lot more to do, to educate these people to live up to their votes and not cry!

Crying will scare our esteemed guests away!

PLEASE STOP CRYING!

Woof Woof

And not everyone was a born leader, said Mr Lee, who recounted what he had learnt about sheepdogs in Australia. A shepherd had told him that it was critical to see if the dog was up to the job. 'If the dog does not have a pair of eyes that can look at a sheep and scare the sheep into doing this, don't try.' - The Business Times, 7 Aug 2007

He is the dog shepherd aka 老狗贼

We are his running dogs, aka 无耻走狗

You peasants are docile silly sheep, aka 小绵羊!!

Hahahahaha

I didn't expect my Big Boss to be so frank!

LOL!

A timely reminder for you peasants!

"REMEMBER your place in society before you engage in political debate, said Information and the Arts Minister George Yeo yesterday.

Debate cannot degenerate into a free-for-all where no distinction is made between the senior and junior party, or what the Hokkiens describe as "boh tua, boh suay".

"You must make distinctions - what is high, what is low, what is above, what is below - and then within this, we can have a debate, we can have a discussion," he added.

Speaking to reporters at the end of his Moulmein tour on the parameters of debate, an issue sparked off by the Catherine Lim controversy, he made it clear that people should not take on those in authority as "equals"...."

The above Straits Times report dated 20th Feb 1994 is most appropriately titled "Debate yes, but do not take on those in authority as 'equals'"


Recently, I notice that many of you peasants are becoming boh tua boh suay. So, as a good ass-licker and apple-polisher, I feel it is my duty to help my Asses and Apples remind you peasants, of what George Yeo said 10 years ago.

So, please, for your own safety, remember your LOW position before talking to us. You are not our equal. Far from it!

Remember ”what is above? what is below?" and talk to us with the appropriate reverence, respect, adoration and admiration!

"Remember your place in society before you engage in political debates" (I couldn't have put it better than George Yeo), you peasants!!!!

你们这些奴才，先撒泡尿照一照自己，别忘了自己的低贱身份，等到你们学会用谦卑，求饶的口气说话, 才来和我们这些高级人物辩论吧！

My Chinese translation of the essence of what George yeo said, for those of you whose England is F9. LOL!

My Big Boss is more advanced

If you don't include your women graduates in your breeding pool and leave them on the shelf, you would end up a more stupid society... So what happens? There will be less bright people to support dumb people in the next generation. That's a problem". -- Lee Kuan Yew, National Day Rally, 1983

If nature does not wish that weaker individuals should mate with the stronger, she wishes even less that a superior race should intermingle with an inferior one; because in such a case, all her efforts, throughout hundreds of thousands of years, to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being, may thus be rendered futile" -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter XI, Race and People

I read somewhere on the internet that some rebels compare my beloved Big Boss to Adolf Hitler.

What an insult!

My Big Boss is not the same as Hitler. Lee Kuan Yew is way way more advanced in thinking compared to Hitler!

Let me explain:

Firstly, you should understand that Hitler regarded the Germans collectively as a superior race. But my Big Boss has not regarded his own people as a collective entity, as one single superior group. Instead, he has divided his own people, Singaporeans, into two distinct classes even though they are all of the same nationality and race (eg. Chinese Singaporeans): the superior elite Singaporeans and the inferior "dumb people" (Sinkies). And my big boss has done that systematically and objectively, via exams at primary 3 (GEP selection), primary 4 (EM1/2/3), primary 6 (PSLE), Secondary 4 (O-level), JC 2 (A-level). Did Hitler implement such nation-wide, multi-year sieving and streaming to seperate the superior from the "dump people"? I don't think so．Then how can you compare him to Lee?

Secondly, Hitler directed his extermination policies to foreigners, namely the Jews, whom he had viewed as inferior. To put it metaphorically, his guns were directed outwards. But my Big Boss went several steps ahead of Hitler. He exterminated his own citizens whom he had deemed inferior, and replaced them with foreigners whom he had deemed superior! Metaphorically, this would be like a family head pointing his guns, not at outsiders, but inwards, aiming at his own family members! That's much more advanced compared to what Hitler did. Don't you agree?

So you rebels, don't insult my Big Boss by comparing him to Hitler; Adolf Hitler is kachiamp puteh, nothing more than ikan bilis, compared to my one and only idol: Lee Kuan Yew!

Anyway, don't you think my big boss looks fiercer than Hitler?

Adolf Hitler should call Lee Kuan Yew Sifu!

Understand?

Show some respect to my Big Boss lah.

LKY is Singapore's Hitler? Please lah! He derverve more credit! *yawn*