2006 - Seng Han Thong punched
打得好！
打得妙！
打得呱呱叫！
该打！
2009 - Seng Han Thong burnt
打得好！打得妙！
打得呱呱叫！
该打！
2009 - Seng Han Thong burnt
烧得好！
烧得妙！
烧得呱呱叫！
该烧！
烧得妙！
烧得呱呱叫！
该烧！
打狗的是个英雄！
烧狗的是个英雄！
I salute you, heroes !
Well Done!
Good Job!
烧狗的是个英雄！
I salute you, heroes !
Well Done!
Good Job!
This is the unfortunate but inevitable consequence of refusing to instill democracy in Singapore - people are forced to act against the extreme grievance and grave injustice that they have suffered for years via violent means, and to overthrow their leaders via non-peaceful revolts.
If we had real democracy, this would most likely not have happened. And in the rare case that it does happen, I will not be here cheering the violent trouble-makers, as there will be legitimate and peaceful ways for them to voice their grievance to a free press or to change the government through the ballot box. Thus such violence cannot be condoned.
But as matter is now, I repeat, these 2 individuals are heroes!
If Singapore has riot one day resulting in death of locals and the leaving of foreign investors, it is the fault of the dictatorial PAP, not the rioters. And it will surely happen one day - it happened to all dictatorship in history. And indeed, that's the only way the Chinese dynasties have ever been replaced, for 5000 years!
So how can authoritarian Singapore hope to be an exception?
For you and your family's safety, emigrate now before that happens.
I will too, once I have made enough money in Young Pay-And-Pay. Haha!
2 comments:
The govt-controlled mass media has been working overtime to paint National Hero Mr. Ong Kah Chua as a petty mentally-unstable man who attacked a PAP dog over an Ang-Pow rejection. False! The hero has never ever applied for Ang Pow. And btw, Mr. Ong's **immediate** neighbour who has known him for **20 years** said the hero does not have a violent or impatient temper nor does he has any violent tendency! This is straight from the Chinese Press. Read between the lines:
聚圣庙没有老汉申领度岁金纪录
（2009-01-13）
● 邹美琳 赖诗琳 刘丽仪 冯剑斌 谢婷婷 周殊钦 吴淑贤 邓莉蓉
聚圣庙理事会理事洪连意(65岁)说，聚圣庙并没有王家财曾申请或领取老人度岁金的纪录。
他说：“庙里没有他（王家财）申请老人度岁金的纪录，过去也没有见过他来领取老人度岁金。”
他也说，杨厝港区的居民都可以申请助学金或老人度岁金，但聚圣庙所分发的奖学金和老人度岁金标准是，只要是得到政府或慈善机构经济援助的居民，就一定会获得该庙发出的度岁金。聚圣庙每年各分发100元给该区有需要的老年人，而且没有限定可获得度岁金的人数。
分发助学金和老人度岁金的仪式，以往都是在寺庙附近的广场举行，但由于成汉通议员当天（11日）也受邀出席在杨厝港民众俱乐部举行的另一活动，因此今年的分发仪式便改在该民众俱乐部举行。
洪连意说，分发仪式举行了大概28年，这是第一次出现这样的状况。
记者昨天下午走访聚圣庙时，寺庙义工都说不曾见过王家财到寺庙来，有的甚至表示没有见过他。
王家财的邻居张志祥（43岁）说，王家财是他20多年的老邻居，虽然交情不深，但他不认为王家财脾气暴躁或是有暴力倾向，所以会发生这样的事，令他感到惊讶。事情发生后，他并没有看到王家财的子女或家属回来。
王家财住家附近的水果店老板李亚明（46岁）说，王家财不时会到店里打发时间，不过事发前的五六天，他就没见到对方出现。
李亚明说：“他在一年多前，几乎每天早上10点会来这里，帮忙扫去店周围的垃圾和蔬果叶子，但他只是来打发时间不是来打工。”
So do u mean the mass media have lied to the mass populations?
Never believe what u read in the papers....hmmmm
Post a Comment